Does Newsweek actually think they are doing Obama any favors with their cover?
1 posted on
05/13/2012 11:05:31 AM PDT by
PJ-Comix
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: PJ-Comix
He’s the prez AND the first lady:)
2 posted on
05/13/2012 11:09:24 AM PDT by
Beowulf9
To: PJ-Comix
LOL. I’ve been saying that since the girly faggot got elected! Newsweek has just clued into it now? BTW, is Newsweek still in business? I’m sure their 17 loyal readers will find the cover very interesting and provocative.
3 posted on
05/13/2012 11:12:02 AM PDT by
Astronaut
To: PJ-Comix
Oh-Bam-Ah! More appropriate cover would be the pics of him bending over bowing to other male leaders. He’s had lots of practice bending over.
4 posted on
05/13/2012 11:12:42 AM PDT by
roadcat
To: PJ-Comix
I saw that cover earlier. I really thought that somebody was making fun of Obama. I really thought somebody photoshopped a picture of Obama with a homosexual themed rainbow halo onto a fake Newsweek cover.
I am really shocked to learn that this is their actual cover picture. I don’t think I shock too easily at what the liberals in the MSM do, but this one seemed so over the top to me.
To: PJ-Comix
They still give him the halo. I doubt that anyone in the world looks to Time and Newsweak for objectivity any more. It's all about finding an echo chamber that repeats back the readers' biases.
7 posted on
05/13/2012 11:15:50 AM PDT by
Pollster1
(“A boy becomes a man when a man is needed.” - John Steinbeck)
To: PJ-Comix
Let me see if I get this: Gays (deviants) make up 1-2% of the entire US population, and he's reaching out to them in order to gain their vote, while at the same time completely turning away independents? WTF! You'll notice i didn't mention black voters included here. The only thing important to him is the color of his skin.
Whomever it is advising Obama to take these actions, I say THANK YOU! :-D
10 posted on
05/13/2012 11:29:23 AM PDT by
Artcore
To: PJ-Comix
Hmmmm ... People here will read that in ways that Andrew may not have intended ...
But it won't be the first time he or Newsweek have shot themselves in the foot.
I guess this is an attempt to one-up Time's breastfeeding cover.
It won't work.
12 posted on
05/13/2012 11:32:31 AM PDT by
x
To: PJ-Comix
I bet his wife is humiliated by this.I wonder if she knew Obama’s preferences before she married him.
To: PJ-Comix
While our church searches for a pastor to replace the one who recently retired after 30 years inour pulpit, we have an interim pastor.
This morning, he began with:
"This is not part of the sermon, but I feel compelled to take a stand: Marriage is between one man and one woman -- for life -- -- because that is what GOD'S WORD says -- no matter what any official says !"
The response was the expected healthy rumble of "Amen!"s -- and then the entire congregation erupted into loud and sustained applause!!
Ø'hØmØ's queer stance definitely has not helped his prospects in Atlanta, Texas!!
17 posted on
05/13/2012 12:05:57 PM PDT by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: PJ-Comix
Mitt Romney should send a thank you note to Newsweek but I would advise him to heed the little French General Napoleon Bonaparte: Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
To: PJ-Comix
The story’s by Andrew Sullivan, no less.
19 posted on
05/13/2012 12:13:59 PM PDT by
rightwingintelligentsia
(Be careful of believing something just because you want it to be true.)
To: PJ-Comix
Is that cover Newsweek’s way of endorsing Romney? How could Newsweek believe that cover does the Liberal Messiah any favors?
BTW, thanks Biden.
22 posted on
05/13/2012 12:44:00 PM PDT by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: PJ-Comix
Axelrod is not this stupid. There is only one possible explanation for all this 'gay' stuff, and the composite girlfriend, etc. etc. Sheriff Joe, the only official who has ever seriously dug deep into Obama’s past, uncovered irrefutable proof of Obama’s homosexual proclivities. They tried to head Joe off w threats from Holder's Dept of Injustice, but Joe, who daily faces the wrath of Mexico's druglords, was unimpressed by Holder's foot stomping. So Axelrod, w the full cooperation of the MSM, is doing everything in his power to soften the blow.
Nothing else makes sense.
To: PJ-Comix
maybe its to get Obama out and save the Democratic-Progressive Party (and the Nation as well). They are loyal to the movement not the man—he was a tool only—they will toss under the bus.
To: PJ-Comix
I wonder if the Taliban still wants to talk to the first gay president....
26 posted on
05/13/2012 1:20:06 PM PDT by
Tzimisce
(THIS SUCKS)
To: PJ-Comix
Interesting maybe the media should dig a little more into the claims of one Larry Sinclair.... now that Obama has officially come out....
43 posted on
05/13/2012 4:19:08 PM PDT by
Typical_Whitey
(Obama reelection means the end of America.)
To: Chode; little jeremiah; wagglebee; GeronL; Slings and Arrows
44 posted on
05/13/2012 4:30:48 PM PDT by
Morgana
(I only come here to see what happens next. It normally does.)
To: PJ-Comix; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Absolutely Nobama; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; Antoninus; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
45 posted on
05/13/2012 4:33:01 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: PJ-Comix
Subtle change now noticeable in the way the media is treating him.
47 posted on
05/13/2012 4:38:33 PM PDT by
Diggity
To: PJ-Comix
This is called “inoculation”.
Obama’s inner circle has concluded that Reggie Love or Larry Sinclair or someone is about to get some airtime calling out Obama as a gay lover.
By running this story first, Tina Brown has converted any talk of Obama’s homosexuality (or bisexuality) into a third party attack on gay “rights”.
Pretty clever...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson