Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

LOL, more for his resume...leading RINO pollster.

http://mittromneycentral.com/2007/04/09/washpost-romneys-inner-circle/

WashPost: Romney’s Inner Circle

Jan van Lohuizen: If you don’t know who van Lohuizen is, that’s just how he likes it. One of the lowest-profile pollsters in politics, van Lohuizen is also one of the most highly regarded. He was a key member of the Bush polling team in 2004 and has had a hand in any number of major GOP victories, including victories by Govs. Charlie Crist (R-Fla.) and Arnold Schwarzenegger’s (R-Calif.) last November.


138 posted on 05/12/2012 4:08:57 PM PDT by JediJones (From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones; darrellmaurina; Graybeard58; blueunicorn6; Antoninus; Lazlo in PA; WPaCon; ...
Why is it no surprise at all that Jan van Lohuizen was involved in a campaign of Charlie Swish Crist or Ahhhhhnold Schwarzenkennedy who has never seen a moral he did not despise in public life including fidelity to his wife, and, of course, now working with Robamney who will take whatever "moral" position his electorate du jour may prefer.

Bill Buckley used to absolutely ridicule this sort of thing as "the Iron Rule that 50%+1 of the electorate just MUST be right" according to a certain kind of politician. Not the kind that any conservative should be caught alive or dead electing but, never mind.

I suspect you made an innocent mistake but are you really saying that Crist or Schwarzenkennedy won political victories in November, 2011???

There is a strong suspicion here that Mr. or Ms. van Lohuizen is taking other people's money to propagandize for his own desperately desired social agenda. It sure looks that way when you see how the electorate votes on the rump ranger issue every time it gets a chance.

As to "anal sex," it may be anal but it is hardly sex. Not between two men. Not between a man and a woman. Not between a man and his wife. Not between a man or woman and a barnyard animal or a household pet. Not between a man or woman and a space alien or ten of them.

The sad confusion between actual sexuality and a wide variety of perversions was the natural consequence of erecting chemical and/or mechanical barriers between the unitive and procreative functions of sexuality and the consequent popularization of fornication, adultery, and a wide variety of STDs. Ever meet a faithful married couple who, healthy at marriage, passed HIV, herpes, AIDS or whatever to one another? Neither have I. I suppose it is technically possible via that ever elusive excuse of the bad blood transfusion but I still have met none.

I am going to go out on a limb here and guess that our world and our relationships would be a lot better off to the extent that we were willing to limit our creative imaginations as to sexual activity to that boring old agenda that God established for married couples according to His Law and for His reasons. Call me old-fashioned. Just the kind of boy I am.

147 posted on 05/12/2012 10:54:42 PM PDT by BlackElk (Romney = Obama = Moloch = Obama = Romney = Moloch = Romney = Obama, Etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson