Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Dominates At-Large Delegate Slate [in Iowa]
The Iowa Republican ^ | May 5, 2102 | Craig Robinson

Posted on 05/11/2012 1:36:20 PM PDT by jjotto

Iowa Republicans have a total of 28 delegates to this year’s national convention in Tampa, Florida. Two delegate selection committee members from each of the state’s four congressional districts met at the Republican headquarters in Des Moines today to draft the slate of 13 at-large delegates that must be ratified by convention delegates at the state convention on June 15th.

Each state is awarded delegates based on a number of factors. Each state starts with ten delegates, five for each U.S. Senator. States are then awarded three delegates for every congressional district. The three members of the Republican National Committee, including the State Chairman, National Committeewoman, and the National Committeeman, also each receive a delegate spot. That means the base number for national delegates for Iowa is 25.

Iowa was also awarded three additional delegates, bringing the total to 28, because the state elected a Republican governor in 2010, 50 percent of the U.S. House seats in the state are represented by Republicans, and Republicans control the Iowa House of Representatives.

Below is the slate of delegates that the committee selected.

At-Large Delegates

Governor Terry Branstad/ U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley/ Margaret Stoldorf – Chair of Montgomery County GOP and Santorum Supporter/ Michelle Bullock – Polk County – Contributor to Ron Paul/ James Mills – State Central Committee Member for Floyd County and Paul Supporter/ Steven Anders – Pottawattamie County Director for Ron Paul/ Roger Leahy – Jefferson County Ron Paul Coordinator/ Mark Hansen – Pottawattamie County Ron Paul Coordinator/ Will Johnson – Dubuque County Ron Paul Organizer/ Lexy Nuzum – Madison County Ron Paul supporter/ Andrea Bie – Allamakee County Ron Paul Supporter/ David Fischer – State Central Committee Member and Ron Paul’s Iowa Co-Chair/ Drew Ivers – State Central Committee Member and Ron Paul’s Iowa Chair

Alternate At-Large Delegates

Lt. Governor Kim Reynolds/ State Senator Brad Zaun – Polk County, Bachmann State Chair/ Dr. Cody Hoefert – Santorum supporter and Lyon County GOP Chair/ Ruth Long – Longtime GOP activist from Union County/ Dr. Sam Clovis – Santorum supporter from Plymouth County also a radio show host/ Jeff Jorgensen – Pottawattamie GOP Chair/ Lisa Smith – Former State Central Committee Member, close friend to Steve Scheffler and Gopal Krishna/ David Wiederstein – Cass County GOP Chair/ Mike Gresham – Fremont County Chair/ Jenifer Bowen – Executive Director of Iowa Right to Life/ John Bowery – Page County GOP Chair and Ron Paul Supporter/ Tracee Knapp – Ringold County/ Therese Davis – Former Chair of Guthrie County GOP

Quick Thoughts

1. The slate has to be approved at the state convention on June 16.

2. Only Branstad and Grassley are sure fire Romney votes.

3. While the alternate delegate list is more diverse, only actual delegates get to vote.

4. The list doesn’t contain a single Romney supporter outside of the elected officials.

5. The list is dominated by people from Southwest Iowa.

6. There is not a single person from Scott or Linn County.

7. Kurt Brown and Dave Jamison were selected to be At-Large Electors

The current makeup of this slate guarantees Ron Paul 10 of Iowa’s 28 delegates. Paul will also be supported by State Chairman A.J. Spiker and National Committeeman Steve Scheffler, which brings his total 12 delegates. Paul only needs to have three delegates elected from the District Nominating Caucuses the night before the state convention to secure a majority of Iowa’s delegates. He will easily get the three delegates he needs.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: larouchies; rino; ronpaul; spammonkeys
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
This is a follow-up because so many FReepers and the MSM misunderstand how Iowa actually chooses Republican National Convention delegates.

Ron Paul's strength is a loud shout that Romney hasn't closed the deal.

1 posted on 05/11/2012 1:36:21 PM PDT by jjotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jjotto

You’re delusional, almost as much so as Ron Paul.


2 posted on 05/11/2012 1:59:46 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Ron Paul - Iran’s favorite candidate more than 0’Hussien O’Zero


3 posted on 05/11/2012 2:06:01 PM PDT by lormand (A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

hehe

I did not mean to indicate Ron Paul could be the nominee. Paul’s strength indicates that Romney couldn’t motivate the GOP-E in Iowa to fight for party control.


4 posted on 05/11/2012 2:09:47 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

kook paul supporters have always been disconnected from reality.

kook paul is just gloming onto a very specific subset of voter. Thos are the same fringe that would vote for a third party regardless.


5 posted on 05/11/2012 2:15:35 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

You are correct.

But the point isn’t Paul, it is that the Establishment can’t keep control.

The Tired Old Party might be ripe for a Tea Party-type takeover.

I had assumed that the behind-the-scenes guys in the GOP would keep the Iowa GOP leadership in the Romney camp. That Paulistinians could bounce them means that almost anyone could.

Maybe the reason why the national RINOs are taking TV jobs is because they know that they can’t be power brokers anymore.


6 posted on 05/11/2012 2:22:56 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

” - - - This is a follow-up because so many FReepers and the MSM misunderstand how Iowa actually chooses Republican National Convention delegates.”

You can say that again!

First Bachmann wins the Iowa Straw Poll. Then Romney wins the early count of the Iowa Caucuses, and within a shake of a lamb’s tail Santorum wins in the late count.

Now your article predicts that Ron Paul will have the majority of voting delegates from Iowa.

If Paul’s plan to cut 1 TRILLION dollars in year-to-year Federal spending, and abolish 5 Federal Departments are the main reasons for Iowa Delegates to thaw out their opposition to Paul, then it might later be said that “the way Iowa goes, so goes the Nation.”

BTW, “T” is for Texas, Tampa and those of us who are TAXED ENOUGH ALREADY!”


7 posted on 05/11/2012 2:33:47 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
  kook paul supporters have always been disconnected from reality

  I support him.
8 posted on 05/11/2012 2:42:21 PM PDT by Maurice Tift (You can't stop the signal, Mal. You can never stop the signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

So a shout out from a liberal nut bag to a liberal RINO is supposed to make us feel better?

I can’t stand either Romney or Paul. I won’t vote for either of them. But especially Paul. I hate truthers and I won’t support one. He needs to go back to the libertarian party and STFU. He needs to take his Occutards along with him.


9 posted on 05/11/2012 2:44:22 PM PDT by Jack Burton007 (This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's listenin' out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

I’m voting for Ron Paul because there is no way I will vote for Romney.

If conservatives can increase their numbesr in House, and take control of the Senate, whoever is our president won’t be able to do a lot to screw us.


10 posted on 05/11/2012 2:47:37 PM PDT by basil (It's time to rid the country of "gun free zones" aka "Killing Fields")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Maurice Tift

I’m not anti Paul, but his supporters are very disruptive and always seem to be looking for trouble and causing chaos within the Party; anyway, that’s what’s happening in AZ.

They call themselves patriots and behave like thugs.


11 posted on 05/11/2012 2:51:14 PM PDT by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: basil; Jim Robinson

Here are some more reasons to vote for Ron Paul in the remaining Primary elections:

1.) It will drive the Liberal Agenda Media (LAM) and their Rove-style political consultants NUTS!

2.) It will deny statistical support to Romney.

3.) It could result in an OPEN Convention in Tampa.

4.) It would irritate the snot out of the GOP-E.

5.) It will put the GOP-E on notice that we think that their RINO Party has done NOTHING since we sent 89 TEA Party men and women to the US Congress in 2010.

6.) An OPEN Convention is our ONLY chance of a successful DUMP ROMNEY campaign.

7.) A superb, true “Dark Horse” Republican Nominee needs an OPEN Convention to replace Romney.

BTW, did I mention the sheer joy of the GOP-Endorsers publicly eating crow?

[To Jim Robinson: No need to reply, as this is just a FYI.]


12 posted on 05/11/2012 3:10:00 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

Actually, the Paul people are very well organized and are pulling off upsets like this in state delegations all over the US. That is, the “official” tally is wildly different from the *actual* delegates.

Importantly, while they do not have the “juice” to win the nomination, they can hopefully block the onerous Romney from a first ballot win. And that can mean “peace and love” between Paul supporters and conservatives.

That is, instead of the onerous Romney, conservatives, who will probably be 60-70% of the total delegates, will get to choose the nominee. However, that nominee is going to have to offer a *lot* to the Paul people for their support.

Importantly, what the prospective conservative will agree to is the “overlap” between conservatives and Paul libertarians. And that is a very big overlap.

In practical terms, my guesses to what the conservative will have to agree to:

1) BIG cuts in government, not just cuts in the rate of growth of government. And this is not just him, but the congressional leadership is going to have to agree to this as well.

2) A strong defense, but a lot less foreign involvement in wars that do not directly affect us. With the president not acting unilaterally anymore.

3) Returning a LOT of federal power to the states. This includes giving a LOT of their land back. Massive conventional energy development. Much more mining. The end to treaties that seek to erode American power.

4) De-police stating much of the US.

There is a lot here that conservatives and Paul supporters can agree on.


13 posted on 05/11/2012 3:52:20 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

What you’ve posted is the recipe for the death of the Iowa caucuses. About damn time too.


14 posted on 05/11/2012 3:54:53 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Willard Romney, purveyor of the world's finest bullmitt. | FR Class of 1998 |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

The Iowa caucuses, as you know, are part of the political party ‘housekeeping’ that is required in a free democracy. Every state has caucuses (or equivalent meetings) to organize political parties. Not every state uses caucuses to select presidential candidates, and neither does Iowa.

The non-binding Iowa caucus presidential preference vote isn’t going away because Iowa would be willing to take a delegate penalty (as Florida does) to keep advertising dollars coming in.

People need to grow up and understand the presidential preference vote at the Iowa caucuses doesn’t really mean anything on an official level.


15 posted on 05/11/2012 4:10:01 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

The whole caucus process ought to eventually have the national convention delegation reflect delegates that respect the vote on caucus night. What we have now is a total co-opting of the process and Ron-freaking Paul in the running to have a majority of Iowa’s delegation to the national convention. That is so freakin’ wrong. I don’t have to leave the Iowa Republican party... it left me.


16 posted on 05/11/2012 4:39:48 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Willard Romney, purveyor of the world's finest bullmitt. | FR Class of 1998 |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

I like the way you think!


17 posted on 05/11/2012 4:50:39 PM PDT by basil (It's time to rid the country of "gun free zones" aka "Killing Fields")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

In my experience, Paultards don’t have staying power. I attribute Paul’s showing not to crafty supporters, but to Romney-fatigued party regulars just backing away. I’m guessing the off-year caucuses in 2014 (yes, there are caucuses in Iowa in non-presidential election years) will be ripe for a takeover by Tea Party/social conservatives.

In even large Iowa precincts, a group of ten people (sometimes less) who plan ahead can pretty much take over a caucus. Find local friends and plan ahead.


18 posted on 05/11/2012 4:57:35 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Iowa’s Republican establishment has gone from domination by people who care exclusively about abortion who, after the court decision, added gay marriage to their litmus test... to being taken over by Paulbots that are already turning-off donors, drying up the money spigot coming into the state party... a finance guy that was slated to stay on thru the state convention recently quit. It’s not going to get better any time soon.


19 posted on 05/11/2012 5:09:35 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Willard Romney, purveyor of the world's finest bullmitt. | FR Class of 1998 |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jack Burton007
I hate truthers and I won’t support one.

We see in others what we despise in ourselves.

20 posted on 05/11/2012 6:37:20 PM PDT by SandwicheGuy (*The butter acts as a lubricant and speeds up the CPU*ou)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson