Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Goldsborough

If you read the article, ‘contact’ has nothing to do with it. They are opposed to competition between sexes in any sport. It could be tennis or croquet. The school’s policy, rather traditional, is to separate the sexes in all athletic endeavors. And to maintain that, they were willing to forfeit the championship.


204 posted on 05/10/2012 8:51:57 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: EDINVA

If you read the article, ‘contact’ has nothing to do with it. They are opposed to competition between sexes in any sport.

<><>><>><

Apparently you selectively read the article, as a careful read would have enlightened you to the fact that this school had no issue with the young lady being on the roster, as long as a gentleman’s agreement that she would not play was honored.

Them’s some principles.


206 posted on 05/10/2012 9:02:23 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

To: EDINVA

Then I find their stance comically naive. A desire to not compete against females in croquet or tennis is really not about respecting girls anymore, it’s about a fear of the fellas of being shown up.


217 posted on 05/10/2012 10:08:59 PM PDT by Goldsborough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson