that is beyond pathetic. The Mass supreme court IMPOSED gay marriage. All Romney and others did was comply with supreme court orders rather than create a constitutional crisis he would lose. He was opposed then to gay marriage, indicated opposition to the ruling the day it was made, advocated to overturn and limit the rulings impact, and has been consistently opposed to it ever since and is opposed now.
Shall I look it up for you?
He does all that and you go around falsely spouting about him being for SSM because of what the mass supreme court did. Un-freaking-believable. That’s like saying Reagan was pro-abortion because the supreme court upheld Roe v Wade.
No, the court itself said it had no legal authority to force gay marriage into law. If Romney had refused to sign legislation legalizing gay marriage, there is nothing the court could have done. Courts can't create laws.
There is big difference between that and a court striking down a law.
Go here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2865617/posts
“Is Mitt Romney the Father of Gay Marriage”
Go to the links.