Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel

You know, this story focuses on Obama, but buried near the fold is the real story. Obama can’t sign the treaty, even if he wanted to, until it is ratified by Congress. A Congress that has one house nearly deadlocked, and the other controlled by Republicans.

If this passes, it will be one more thing we can thank the socialist wing of the GOP for.


13 posted on 05/09/2012 4:44:53 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

Actually it’s only the Senate that ratifies treaties. Fortunately it needs 67 votes to ratify a treaty. I love the wisdom of our founders!


14 posted on 05/09/2012 4:53:06 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman
Obama can’t sign the treaty, even if he wanted to, until it is ratified by Congress.

He sure as hell can sign it and it is NOT without consequence. If he or even his designated representative does sign it, the Department of State holds it as binding as a matter of "customary international law." This is why Bush rescinded the signature on the International Criminal Court Treaty Clinton signed.

Learn more about that here.

18 posted on 05/09/2012 5:25:01 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman

Well, I know it has to be ratified, but that it is even being considered is extremely disturbing to me, that we have people running our government who would GIVE away our sovereignty.


29 posted on 05/10/2012 6:16:53 PM PDT by rlmorel ("The safest road to Hell is the gradual one." Screwtape (C.S. Lewis))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson