Read the whole article. The ruling actually makes sense.
The crime is not in viewing alone. If you have a virus or click on some link that throws that stuff up on the screen, guess what, you have just viewed child porn.
So should you go to jail? Of course not.
The state has to amass other evidence to prove that you actually went looking for the stuff and downloaded it deliberately knowing full well what it was.
That’s how I read it anyway.
Libertarians will be happy, yay, free sex and drugs
there is no way you "accidentally" stumble across child porn unless you're also "accidentally" stumbling across adult porn sites too...
in either case, the person is a pervert with probably a small member who has to compensate by lusting after small children or women....
actual real children and actual real women are hurt by porn and its minions....actual real life human beings are being objectified...
I find no rationalization for allowing "mistakes"....