[CitizenM]

The hypocrisy of the confused, self-serving Liberal mind. Now they declare that an unborn baby is a life and human entity when they want to "count" it. But if they want to abort it...well, then that's alright because it is only a collection of cells and not really a human anyway.

And...What happens if the mother aborts the baby after she has visited the White House and the child was recorded as a "visitor?" Do they go back and ask that the record of that baby be deleted, since, obviously, the pro-abortion belief is that human baby never existed?

How can anyone figure out such conflicting reasoning?

[Anti-Hillary]

The dumb get dumber and, well, the folks at FR just scratch their collective heads... This counrty is bassackwards for sure! And to think that liberals are usually creatures of “higher learning”...

[Brown Deer]

The National Right to Life Committee released a statement on Tuesday afternoon about Shafer’s email, highlighting the fact that the “Obama White House recognizes [a] ‘baby that has not been born’ for White House security purposes, but tolerates legal abortion to [the] moment 
of birth in District of Columbia.”

"It is ironic that President Obama's staff recognizes the existence of unborn babies for purposes of providing security within the White House -- yet, there is no indication that President Obama has any problem with the fact that throughout the District of Columbia, abortion is now legal for any reason up to the moment of birth,” said Douglas Johnson, National Right to Life legislative director. “Notably, the newsletter provides no guidance on what the staff should do if an unborn baby is first registered for security purposes, but then aborted. On May 17, the House Judiciary Constitution Subcommittee plans to hold a hearing on the District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R. 3803), which would generally prohibit abortion in the sixth month and later in the District. If the President wants to provide for the security of the unborn child immediately outside of the White House gates, as well as inside, he should endorse this bill."

[justrepublican]

Birthers.

[sthguard]

Maybe they’ll compromise and count pre-born babies as three-fifths of a person.

[NKP_Vet]

Just means democrats have no problem at all with MURDER. They could care less if there’s living, breathing human being residing in the body of the murder. They thinks it’s the “right” of the mother to murder this child, time and time again, if she feels like it.

[Biggirl]

Yet this is the same Obama White House that would struggle to explain why a legit BC cannot be produced from Obama.

[donna]

Is this a joke? Why would anyone register an unborn baby?

[plain talk]

This is incredibly stupid on many levels. Count the unborn however they wish but how about we just don’t kill them?

[Delta 21]

But what if the mother is planning on getting an abortion?

[Noob1999]

................How can anyone figure out such conflicting reasoning?...................

Maybe it’s easy. If the mother-to-be checks off Democrat, her future vote will be counted as two votes, as they both visited the White Hut!

[Ellendra]

Obama White House recognizes [a] ‘baby that has not been born’ for White House security purposes,

What security threat does an unborn baby pose during such a tour?

[proud American in Canada]

I don’t understand the reasoning behind this requirement. If I were pregnant, I certainly wouldn’t do that. I wouldn’t visit if I were showing. No need to give the government more information than necessary.

And yes, the hypocrisy is stunning.

[frogjerk]

ping