Jews have a burden of proof, and must try the facts in lower courts. Arabs, however, merely need allege private ownership in a complaint to the high court, without even naming a specific owner, and Begatz orders in the bulldozers. Zionism, it seems, really is racism, but against Jews.
To: Eleutheria5
Zalum complained to the AFP that there had been a systematic takeover by settlers of properties in the area. Jews don't "settle" in their own city, Habib. They LIVE there. Arabs merely squat. BTW, Jerusalem is not mentioned even once in the Koran (vs. 167 times in the Old Testament). The Courts should start to mention that little fact.
2 posted on
05/07/2012 4:00:40 PM PDT by
montag813
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Pretty rude. Just because a Jew owns property doesn't mean he can enjoy it's use. That's an old European/mideastern principle.
3 posted on
05/07/2012 4:34:32 PM PDT by
SJackson
(As a black man, you know, Barack could get shot going to the gas station, M Obama)
To: Eleutheria5; dennisw; SJackson
Both properties one a residence, the other a shop are in the Al-Qarameh neighborhood between the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and the Temple Mount. " That narrows it down to the northern half of the Old City.
In that area, kids scream at everyone walking by on any but the main streets, yelling, "This is an arab-only part of the city! Get out."
A lady and I walked through there, ignoring their lies and about 15 arab kids spit on my female-friend from their stairways.
4 posted on
05/07/2012 5:17:55 PM PDT by
jonatron
(This is the Land of the Free, the Home of the Brave.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson