Replies

Hmmm, maybe I missed it, but did this “objective” article happen to mention the cooked climate data from Prof. Michael Mann, and the other stooges at East Anglia in Britain? Probably not, wouldn't want to put a negative light on all of this “consensus.”

The whole notion of “settled science” with a whole area of science (earth's climate) is ridiculous. No such thing exists among all scientists or there would be no need for any more research on climate and weather. It would all be done (settled) and total truth and fact would be known! Biology is not “settled” science although are are facts that have been established in the area of Biology.

The other problem for climatologists of the global warming persuasion is that fact in Western science is established through peer review in publishing methods and results. Too bad they had fanatics who manipulated the normal review process of climate scientists through dishonestly controlling publication results in the area of climate change so the “results” are not really not established science. Watermelons, so in love with Marxist authoritarian propaganda, screwed the pooch.