“The difference is that there is a traditional way to have babies.”
Next, you’ll be saying that only children conceived using the missionary position should be allowed to live. Sheesh.
Two children are born, and most here are spewing hate...lovely.
“Next, you’ll be saying that only children conceived using the missionary position should be allowed to live. Sheesh.”
Well, there have been many “positions”, traditionally speaking. All result in natural insemination.
But the matter here is an artificial/unnatural insemination and the fertilized egg being unnaturally implanted on the “womb”. There is nothing natural about this. It is like making ice-cubes. Nothing natural about it.
“Next, you’ll be saying that only children conceived using the missionary position should be allowed to live. Sheesh.”
Well you went to the core of the problem...wonder where the name came from?
Next, you’ll be saying that only children conceived using the missionary position should be allowed to live. Sheesh.
**************************************************
Don’t laugh there are those who think just that and it has to be in the dark and they have to have their night clothes on. Anyone who would do that different is depraved and perverted and going to L.
Note: I am terribly perverted.
“Next, you’ll be saying that only children conceived using the missionary position should be allowed to live. Sheesh.”
That’s ridiculous. There are a great many pro-lifers who are opposed to IVF, because the procedure results in a great many more DEATHS of human beings than lives. This includes the Catholic Church. The opposition has nothing to do with wanting children to die, in fact it is the opposite.
Is there another way?