Why would she lie?.....for personal gain. How could being recognized as an American Indian benefit her?....Minorities get special treatment, affirmative action, low interest loans, etc....So..Like any grifter democrat she lies...it is one of their favorite tools. But she lies by commmitting a fraud on the unsuspecting. So having committed lies and fraud in hopes of self gratuities, she milks it until 1996 when she had become a Harvard professor. At this point she had wrung all she could out of it and decided to move on to other felonies.
1. Did she receive any favored action which could have gone to a real American Indian?
2. Did she take a low interest loan unavailable to others of a different ethnicity?
3. If she took a loan or accepted a position as a Harvard student IN PLACE OF another did she defraud anyone.
4. If she was placed as a student via committing a fraud, should she be disbarred for lying to Harvard Law?
5. Did she receive any loan, grant, or money otherwise from the federal taxpayer under fraudulent malfeasance, and if so, will she be prosecuted?
Scott Brown needs to ask these questions.
He should. But she didn't go to Harvard as a student: George Washington University, University of Houston, Rutgers University, Newark. She's old enough that race wouldn't have been a factor at GWU and probably not at UH. Her claiming to be an Indian probably would have started later, when she was teaching at Texas, Pennsylvania, or Harvard.