Posted on 05/02/2012 9:54:32 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
Generally speaking, I think the Washington Posts Eugene Robinson is the most profoundly stupid and uninsightful writer on any editorial page in any paper in any country. But file this one under Blind Hog/Acorn.
Moderator Wolf Blitzer opened Tuesdays Republican debate by introducing himself and adding, for some reason, Yes, thats my real name. A few moments later, the partys most plausible nominee for president said the following: Im Mitt Romney, and yes, Wolf, thats also my first name.
But its not. Mitt is the candidates middle name. His first name is Willard.
And people wonder why this guy has an authenticity problem?
For a while Dem strategists have been making public pronouncements on Romneys seeming inability to distinguish fact from fiction and his near pathological instinct to make his audience believe he is just like them. Even Jon Stewart has poked fun at Romneys flip flops.
When the election season started I was convinced that even though I did not like Romney, he was the most electable candidate in the pack. Since then Ive changed my views. Romney cant win in a general election because very few people, outside the 20% who like his hair and a handful of devoted fluffers, will vote for the man.
He will lose a lot of conservatives because we fear that he will energetically return to his past persona as a liberal New England governor if he is elected. As the GOP winning the Senate in 2012 is very close to a gimme we have to ask: can conservatism survive a President Romney and a Senate Majority Leader McConnell?
He will lose a lot of GOP, as opposed to conservative, support because he is a supremely smarmy and untrustworthy character whose core value is defined by a strong belief that he should be president and nothing more.
While Plouffe and Carville are validating our feelings about Romneys squishiness, the real attack, the one that will strip away the moderate center that Romney has been relying on is waiting in the wings.
Obama cant attack Romney as a flip-flopper because many of the flips and flops Romney has held dear at one time or another are actually Obamas own positions. The Romney response to that line of attack in a national election is easy: I held that position then but have sense developed information that makes me believe it was incorrect and I have changed it and everyone wants a pragmatic president who can change his mind, right?
The main attack will be on Romneys long time affiliation with the corporate chop-shop known as Bain Capital. In an environment were most people are concerned about their jobs and virtually everyone is angry at Wall Street, Romney will be the perfect poster boy for the 1% that the 99% rails on and on about.
So abandoned by conservatives, the GOP, and moderates who is left as his logical constituency? The same tiny group of admirers that follow him today.
I dont know if Newt Gingrich or Rick Perry can beat Obama. What I am positive of is that Mitt Romney cannot win a general election against any national Democrat figure. The only saving grace is that he probably cant win a GOP primary either.
On the one hand, he has done that for 5 years -- and has Robert Bork chairing his judge-picking committee.
On the other hand, Romney chose not to fight the left-dominated Executive Council in Massachusetts (which must approve all judge picks) and, instead of fighting for conservative judge picks, just rolled over and picked a bunch of liberals.
Yeah... like totally... for sure.
LLS
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.