You have pre-judged me, sir. You have no idea what agony I personally experienced between your first comment and my response.
You have no idea what agony I personally experienced between your first comment and my response.
Any discomfiture you might, or might not, have experienced isn't my concern. It sure didn't stop you from continuing to post your recommendations for the bill despite being told it was BS.
I can not, would not, dispute Herb Titus.
Yet you did just that by urging others to support the bill. You apparently did no research on it whatsoever after that first reply of mine, nor did I see then you asking why it was a bad bill. Instead you chose to continue to post it anyway.
However Bret Baiers comments have aroused controversy in regard to Obamas eligibility. This is a GOOD thing.
All Bret's comments did was show that he's just another talking head who parroted what he had been told. He used Byron York of the Washington Examiner as his only source.
The controversy was already aroused. It got aroused in his direction and he obviously was disconcerted by it.
Bret explains "natural born citizen" requirements for president and vice president
His was one of the most pronounced backpedals I've ever witnessed. If such a piece happens the guest speakers will be most telling.