Better yet, since the relevant section isn't that long I'll post it.
A natural born citizen, by contrast, is not dependent upon Congress passing a statute or the constitution being amended. A natural born citizen is a citizen of a specific nation by the law of nature of citizenship. The law of nature of national citizenship is written into the very nature of the universe of nation-states, and is universal as to place, uniform as to person, and fixed as to time. By definition the law governing natural born citizenship exists independent of any human power, legislative or otherwise. That is why "natural born citizenship" is not defined in the Constitution. Such citizenship exists whether recognized by positive law or not. Such citizenship is God-given. To qualify one must be born to a father and a mother each of whom is a citizen of a particular state in order for the person to be "natural born" citizen of that state.
I can not, would not, dispute Herb Titus. However Bret Baier’s comments have aroused controversy in regard to Obama’s eligibility. This is a GOOD thing.
Anxiously awaiting Sheriff Arpaio’s next report.