Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36
Positive law doesn't make someone qualify for a natural law status.

What does that have to do with anything? It's simple. You said anyone covered under 8 USC § 1401 had to be an alien first, because the larger 8 USC was titled "Aliens and Nationality."

But 8 USC § 1401 begins, "The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth."

When is someone who's a "citizen of the United States at birth" ever an alien? In the womb?

99 posted on 05/01/2012 11:28:37 AM PDT by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
What does that have to do with anything?
Do you even know what positive law and natural law are?
If you did you wouldn't be asking the question.

When is someone who's a "citizen of the United States at birth" ever an alien? In the womb?
Ummm...key words there...at birth.
If that child in the womb is aborted were they ever even a citizen or an alien?

112 posted on 05/01/2012 11:54:49 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical; GregNH; rxsid; LucyT; melancholy
“When is someone who's a ‘citizen of the United States at birth’ ever an alien?”

Any foreign born child prior to meeting the statutory requirements for retroactive “citizen at birth” status is an alien until processed under the statute.

John McCain was an alien at birth in the Panama Canal Zone. IIRC, within about two years of his birth, Congress passed a law deeming that Panama Canal Zone births to two US citizen parents were retroactively citizens at birth.

The US Senate tried to create the appearance of amending the Constitution with ludicrous nonbinding resolution 501 which declared that McCain was a retroactive Natural Born Citizen as well. I don't believe that McCain had to naturalize to be a US citizen.

IIRC until recently children of US military on foreign bases excluding the Canal Zone had to have naturalization papers filed for them to convert from alien to retroactive statutory US citizen at birth and many were dual citizens until they affirmatively dropped the second citizenship on majority for that country.

Barry's legal team has gone off the deep end in their latest filing in defense of his ballot eligibility in several states including NJ by citing to 9th Circuit case, US v Marguet-Pillado, with Barry's legal team claiming that even if Barry was born in a foreign country with only a biological (unwed) relationship to a US citizen he would still be a natural born citizen.

See my FR thread for the latest legal action:

“Obama cites US v Marguet-Pillado. Dicta implies Obama eligible even if born in Kenya (vanity)”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2857598/posts?q=1&;page=1#1

BTW, the State Department used to state that SCOTUS had not yet ruled on whether a statutory “natural born citizen” (statutory citizen at birth) was POTUS eligible.

145 posted on 05/01/2012 1:10:36 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson