Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie
I refuse to support Obama, nor anyone who works for him. Whoever is the Republican nominee, will receive my vote.
33 posted on 04/29/2012 5:15:05 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: elpadre

Ditto, I’m really getting over this crap on here.


41 posted on 04/29/2012 5:19:21 PM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: elpadre

‘Whoever is the Republican nominee, will receive my vote.’

Does that include Jeb Bush?


75 posted on 04/29/2012 6:23:50 PM PDT by bigoil (Study Thy Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: elpadre; DoughtyOne
Whoever is the Republican nominee, will receive my vote.

Those were the good ol' days when it worked that way. Sadly I must acknowledge the reality as it has evolved in the Republican party. And it makes me realize that this 2012 primary is just Part II of the 2008 primary, and this time, ace-in-the-hole Palin is out of game for Romney; if she joined him, she'd be negating her own credibility.

Listen, my vote, like your vote, is an oar in the water. That's all it is, and not to use it would be dereliction. Facing up to facts, I see that we've reached the point where voting Republican requires me to vote against my own self-interest morally and financially. Voting for the Republican is as absurd as voting for the Democrat -- the only reason I'm given to vote that way is sheer panic and desperation to avoid Obama. It's a fact of life that people do stupid things when they react out of panic.

So I've got this oar in the water and the duty to use it. I know how I'm voting if it comes to R v O. It will be a third alternative, a viable alternative, risky but the ONLY alternative.

I'm going to vote to make liberalism weaker: I'm going to vote AGAINST both of them, and use my oar to direct a rightly course. As far as I'm conserned, rejecting Romney is a little bit like sculling. It's as nuts to vote for Romney as it is to vote for Obama. Sorry, that's the hard-core truth.

So we'll see whether or not Obama really is as awesomely Oz-like as Rally-Round-Romney Chicken Littles think he is. He's a little man behind the curtain.

231 posted on 05/01/2012 2:47:24 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: elpadre; DoughtyOne

I forgot — I pinged DO because of his perfect way of putting it: Romney is a bridge too far. Forget him.


233 posted on 05/01/2012 2:50:34 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson