Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jobim

“I will keep an eye out for [Smith] now.”

He’s pretty good, this was a very interesting article. I don’t really think he’s right about the “classics” and publishing, I’ve heard that publishers love that copyright free material. But it could be changing as ebooks advance.

I read BNW years ago and didn’t like it very much. I thought it very inferior to 1984 which I found absolutely harrowing. When I finished 1984 I thought “well, I’m really glad I read this and neither a million dollars nor a gun to my head will every get me to read it again”.

Maybe I should read BNW again, it does seem to be coming true, I often think of those test-tube babies!


18 posted on 04/29/2012 12:38:55 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: jocon307

Huxley and Orwell were fleshing out the future from different angles, not in competition. Orwell’s is exterior, so to speak, in that it was from the vantage point of a futuristic totalitarian state. Huxley’s is interior, depicting a world in which our inner corruptions become writ large across society. His was much more an examination of personal morality.


20 posted on 04/29/2012 1:51:33 PM PDT by jobim (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson