Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Nerks

“I didn’t post nude images, I posted FACES.”

I know. I used that term as a way to differentiate between the known Stanley Ann photo set. It gets confusing crisscrossing references to photos throughout the posts. Didn’t mean anything disparaging by it.

“They are identified as such throughout various articles on the web, so I presume that’s who it is.” (Marcy)

I presume the same.

“But now you can see that the provocative photographs ARE NOT Stanley Ann Dunham either.”

I really can’t say whether it is her or not. It might be her or it might not. In my opinion, she does have a strong resemblance to Stanley Ann is about all I can say for sure.

“THE ORIGINALS TWO YEARS AGO in a ‘house’ FMD VACATED WHEN HE DIED IN 1987 is not believable.”

Agreed. There is no real provenance for these photos. Until there is, nobody can be certain who it is.


202 posted on 05/02/2012 6:54:52 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]


To: Smokeyblue
...Agreed. There is no real provenance for these photos. Until there is, nobody can be certain who it is.

Correct, and that's all I was attempting to make clear; the efforts of the author to convince us that he obtained the originals of the images from the private residence of Frank Marshall Davis is patently false. He obtained the images from the same place we all did - from the web, and any connection to FMD or Stanley Ann Dunham remains conjecture.

205 posted on 05/02/2012 7:42:39 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson