[little jeremiah]

IIRC a form (not this one) was dated an August date that was on a weekend and that made it very suspicious.

[Fred Nerks]

That was the transcipt, it looked as if the date was August 19, iirc...the U of WA apparently explained that the numbered date 8/19/1961 should have been 9/19/1961, and that the number 8 appeared to be a 9 because it was mutilated...maybe David remembers, if he's available to reply.

See bottom right hand side, highlighted - and that still remains a problem. The revised or corrected date of September 19, is still a week away from the first date of instruction shown as September 25.