[little jeremiah]

Au contraire, the Auntie thread has zero evidence that SAD was in Seattle with a baby at the time “Anna Obama” was there. No evidence at all.

[Seizethecarp]

“Au contraire, the Auntie thread has zero evidence that SAD was in Seattle with a baby at the time “Anna Obama” was there.”

You have no proof the INS docs are not genuine.

There is discussion of the INS FOIA docs on the Auntie thread...docs which are evidence. You and others may claim they are forged, but they are evidence.

The INS FOIA doc provide contemporaneous proof that Stanley Ann planned to go to a university in Seattle in Sept 1961, so to Polk docs and witness accounts of her line up with that Ann Obama being her, as to the transcripts. To make your narrative work the INC docs and UW and UH doc must ALL have been forged.

There is no evidence provided in the INS FOIA docs that the notation of a “wife in the Philippines” was provided by BHO Sr. or was just a brain fart by an INS worker in Baltimore who didn't know the difference between Hawaii and the Philippines...and no proof of any “Anne Obama” giving birth to a mixed race baby anywhere on the planet.

You are willing to accept the INS docs as proof of a non-SADO mom for a BHO Sr. baby, but you don't accept the same docs as proof that BHO Sr and SADO were claimed to have been married (as reported to INS by UH) or that SADO was planning to be in Seattle in the fall of 1961.

The originals of the INS FOIA docs can be subpoenaed for verification, unlike the so far unrevealed documents of an alternative non-Stanley Ann "Anna in Seattle." The INS FOIA docs refute and exclude both that Filipino Anna and the Dreams narratives for Barry.