I think this means the government will spend a lot of money to get them back.
1 posted on
04/28/2012 4:15:14 PM PDT by
arthurus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: arthurus
Mexico City, L.A....... what's the difference?
Why move?
Socilists RUIN EVERY country they have EVER taken over.
30 posted on
04/28/2012 5:03:18 PM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
To: arthurus
So far so good. The silver lining to Obamanomics.
To: arthurus
Not buying it.
But of course, this can be used by the open borders folks as another justification for granting asylum to the 15 to 20 million here illegally now. See, the problem has solved itself and now there is little reason to put off legalization of the fine, hardworking, churchgoing folks already here.
32 posted on
04/28/2012 6:03:47 PM PDT by
Will88
To: arthurus
33 posted on
04/28/2012 6:29:45 PM PDT by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation Continues)
To: arthurus
34 posted on
04/28/2012 7:08:00 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: arthurus
In other words, if the work dries up, a certain percentage will indeed self-deport.
Secure the border. Enforce the law. Over a very few years the problem will resolve itself. No need for any grand “comprehensive” anything other than the triple-fence and the concerted focus on enforcing existing laws.
36 posted on
04/28/2012 7:38:29 PM PDT by
marron
To: arthurus
Ah, the new meme from the OBL.
37 posted on
04/28/2012 9:31:42 PM PDT by
headstamp 2
(Liberalism: Carrying adolescent values and behavior into adult life.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson