No you don't I just said I found nothing in post 1 that I didn't agree with. If you disagree then say so. My very first post on this thread stated that his post would bring out hundreds of pages of court decisions and precedent positions all of which would lead no where. Arguing with lawyers is about a sane as trying to argue with a Berkley Communist.
The only hope on this subject is to somehow get the argument into an honest court, to look at the fraudulent documents that have been presented to create the unknown president that we have.
I really don't understand all the support here for the status quo, unless there really is no concern for the preservation of the Republic.
No you don't I just said I found nothing in post 1 that I didn't agree with.
Yes, I do. You've stated much more than just that you found nothing in post 1 that you didn't agree with as is evidenced in your reply 50 alone.
The NBC issue to me is a simple one based on common sense, but that will never fly in this thread. Suffice to say it is only a means to an end in attempt to prove that every document produced ha been a fraud, and further the leadership in both parties knew them to be fraudulent. Which either makes them incredibly stupid or complicit, I chose the latter.
The more you say (type) the clearer what you think and believe becomes.
And you're, understandably, really cynical as well, but I won't bother posting links to those comments.