Well we never had Open Borders Ted Kennedy and Motor Voter, and No ID to vote. The NBC issue to me is a simple one based on common sense, but that will never fly in this thread. Suffice to say it is only a means to an end in attempt to prove that every document produced ha been a fraud, and further the leadership in both parties knew them to be fraudulent. Which either makes them incredibly stupid or complicit, I chose the latter.
If a person is born on US Soil is he NBC? Logic from your answer to that simple question would lead to definitions of the other 4 possibilities. You don't need the Supreme Court to tell you that. What we do need is a single State Attorney General and an honest judge (that in itself may be impossible)to ask for proof of citizenship before placing Zero on the ballot, that could lead to discovery and the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the people of the United States may begin to unravel. In the end I doubt it will really matter because the New Improved version is on deck.
Ignore my #46. I understand your position clearer now.
Obummer did provide proof. It was a forgery but it was his proof. In it was stated that his father was not a citizen of this country. NOT ONE SINGLE AUTHORITY pointed out that his father must be a U.S. citizen in order for him to be qualified. That is why I say we need a definitive definition of CBC and that must be issued by the Supremes somehow.
What would have stopped his mother from putting a U.S. citizens name on the document? People lie. Hospitals are not qualified to determine the truth. Anyone can say anything and get a valid birth certificate for their child.
You say we need an honest judge. I completely agree. When one finally does show up the case will try to make its way up to the Supreme Court and it will be cut off by some liberal appelate court. This is an unwinnable situation.