Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs
In 2007 and 2008 dems had 51 in the Senate which is not a ruling majority.

Did you read the part about the 2 "Independents" caucusing with the Rats giving them effectively 53? I'm confused now that that fact is in the conversation, why the 51 part was repeated?
58 posted on 04/27/2012 10:08:16 AM PDT by copaliscrossing (Progressives are Socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: copaliscrossing
RE :”Did you read the part about the 2 “Independents” caucusing with the Rats giving them effectively 53? I'm confused now that that fact is in the conversation, why the 51 part was repeated?

Did you read about the 49 Dems with the two independents giving them 51 against Republicans 49 plus Cheney in 2007??You are off by 2 again/

How about the 60 vote filibuster rule.

Be careful about depending on only Republican sources for info. I was talking to a Dem coworker today who was defending Obama on his citizens United attack on SCOTUS and after a few questions he had no idea what the case was about or what they decided, he just believed what Obama and MSNBC said. dont trust any media.

61 posted on 04/27/2012 10:18:09 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is a liberal. Just watch him closely screw you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson