[lacrew]

I think we are taking the ‘billing mistake’ at face value...and maybe we shouldn’t.

1. Did she receive services? Yes
2. Was she responsible for the bill? Yes.

If there was some confusion over how much insurance was supposed to pay etc., its still her responsibility to make sure the bill gets paid. Its that simple.

In alot of ways, this story reminds me of the Trayvon Martin case - we are presented with a victim, with very few details, and a slanted story....this makes me immediately suspicious. The details we weren’t given probably do not advance the story.

[Ratman83]

Well at this point I do not think the courts, lawyers, police, politicians, insurance, businesses or the press has any leg to stand on. All have shown that they are unworthy of trust.

If you get billed for something that was not yours then you are not responsible for it.

we are presented with a victim, with very few details, and a slanted story....this makes me immediately suspicious. On that we can agree.