[Notary Sojac]

Your position (if I interpret you correctly) is that any evidence which appears to contradict the Bible must of necessity be incorrect or insufficient.

In essence, this is a faith-based position.

My response would be that I respect where you are coming from, but I am not inclined to answer your arguments in detail, since it would be an exercise with no potential of success.

[BrandtMichaels]

I always like to dig deeper into the science, the author, their background, and their assumptions whenever ‘any evidence appears to contradict the Bible’ and it has been very beneficial for my understanding of all that is important.

Of course the links I provided you are still centered squarely on the science. But it requires an open mind and the ability to see that all of our modern day science is NOT necessarily science. There’s major loads of political horse manure mixed in ~ what you get anytime the gov funding kicks in.