Good points OLR, esp. ‘They can’t even test their theories. That’s all it is - theory. They often base things on what they know of existent animals. All they can REALLY say is, “this creature existed”.’
They also anthropomorphize God and think He is capable of sin and errors as Notary Sojac indicates in post #63.
You are 180 degrees from correctness here.
I'd be happy to entertain the possibility of creation/design. Some of the arguments are intriguing and provide a valid challenge to my world view.
But when creationists describe the motivations and the ethics of the creator, they are the ones who anthropomorphize, not me.
If you want to talk to me about the mathematics of chance and the improbability of universal physical and mathematical constants occurring at random, I'm open to listen.....when you switch to telling me about how T. rex was a vegetarian up until the moment that Eve bit into that apple, I'm signing out.
In the fossil record, morality leaves no trace. Not an atom.