[DManA]

"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."

I wouldn't exactly call that a ringing condemnation of evolution theory. Of course you should examine the evidence carefully. What scientist wouldn't agree with that?

[schaef21]

***”We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.”

I wouldn’t exactly call that a ringing condemnation of evolution theory. Of course you should examine the evidence carefully. What scientist wouldn’t agree with that?***

You’re kidding, right?

Scientists (see Global Warming/Climate Change) get locked into a worldview and browbeat those who disagree into silence. They use circular reasoning to make evidence fit their theory, they don’t present any evidence that sheds a negative light on their theory and they dismiss any “naysayers” as quacks.

I might suggest you check out the documentary “Expelled”.

[Yashcheritsiy]

What scientist wouldn't agree with that?

It depends on how the terms are defined.

[mikemoose]

“What scientist wouldn’t agree with that?” Climate scientists, for one. ;)

[editor-surveyor]

>> “What scientist wouldn’t agree with that?” <<

.
One that was clinging dogmatically to a failed ‘theory.’ (Obviously the term ‘scientist’ is grossly inapplicable to such an individual)
.