[Mariner]

"You’d sue them for what?"

Using public dollars to fund the teaching of a religious dogma.

This is a no-brainer and I'm surprised you asked.

There is very substantial court precedent over the last 50 years and validation by the USSC in multiple cases.

Thank God.

[alstewartfan]

Then why aren’t you suing your district for teaching secularist religious dogma every bit as silly as athropogenic “climate change”? There is no science in macro=evolutionary theory whatsoever. Bob

[Bellflower]

Using public dollars to fund the teaching of a religious dogma.

So you are either saying that no religious dogma can be true, by merit of it being a religious dogma, or that even if it is absolutely true, a lie must be taught in it's place. Do you really think that you are making sense? A lie is better than the truth, if it involves your Creator, who created everything that is being taught about? What a convoluted world you provide.