Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: montanajoe

I don’t accept your premise that this man didn’t love and have fidelity to his country.

He also qualified his statement that was the focus of the charge.

“Stein later clarified that statement saying he would not follow unlawful orders.”


34 posted on 04/25/2012 1:46:33 PM PDT by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: rbmillerjr
He also qualified his statement that was the focus of the charge.

Was that the 'Screw 0bama' or somthing else?

From the article: At the hearing this month at Camp Pendleton, Torresala argued that Stein's behavior repeatedly violated Pentagon policy and should be dismissed after he ignored warnings from his superiors about his postings.

Nobody has to follow unlawful orders, so that isn't a big deal. He ignored the counseling, hoping to score a political victory. Didn't make it.

36 posted on 04/25/2012 1:58:15 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: rbmillerjr
“I don’t accept your premise that this man didn’t love and have fidelity to his country”

That is not my premise, my premise is that if politics is more important to an individual than their love and fidelity to this country they should not serve.

Its a simple concept that simple grunts like me, my father and my grandfather and millions of others before were able to understand and nothing has changed to make the concept suddenly incomprehensible.

37 posted on 04/25/2012 2:05:05 PM PDT by montanajoe (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson