Meanwhile, the 0bozo administration fights State Voter ID laws and State Immigration Laws all the while selectively enforcing immigration laws and in effect granting amnesty to illegals --all this premised upon making the claim that they can not handle the workload that this 'study' suggests does not exist.
I would offer this simple view. Lots of houses stand empty right now...which five years ago...had owners in them and always doing some type of minor renovation. From my local area in Arlington, VA...I’d say that half of all the small renovation deals...were done by illegals. If the houses empty....small-time renovation has come to a close. Even if you do occupy a house...there’s fair odds that you are pretty cramped on money for improving your residence.
So I’m thinking that street illegal that you used to hire for a day of drywall work....has decided enough is enough...and returned to his hometown.
You have to admit...the US economy in most small towns in America...is stagnant. Without cash flow...why would an illegal in hopes of finding day-to-day employment linger around?
I do.
Demographics, demographics, demographics. Demographics is destiny.
TFR in Mexico is only 2.27 children/women.
If we take 2.1 children as the ratio for population balance, that leaves 0.17 free to emigrate. That means only about 8 percent of the entire population would be free to emigrate, or only around 8 million people. Max. Even if you had unrestricted borders you’d get 8 million mexicans in the US over a period of 20 years.
I don’t believe the study either. In the first place I do believe that the number of illegals has always far exceeded the few million any study claims. Returning to Mexico? Not in Texas. They have continued to pour over the border, cranking out more babies and taking over.