[StAnDeliver]

"That sounds nice - except that isn’t the goal for the LGBT folks. They don’t want to stop there. They want their “new” definition to be universal. They want to force the adoption agencies to accept the new definition. They want the schools to bring it into the curriculum. They want churches to be forced to ignore scripture and accept the new definition. Most Americans have buried their heads in the sand concerning this."

The corollary is that you can guarantee that a acerbic Beltway gay drawn to political power (a) belongs to the cadre you describe and (b) thusly has no place at the top of the GOP candidate's policymaking.

[Scotswife]

I don’t know about being able to “guarantee” anything.

He has been described as an activist who has fought for the new definition of marriage.
The article also stated he has scrubbed his twitter account of offensive material.

So my main question is...why would Romney consider such a person?
He is trying to make a statement.
Surely - there must be qualified candidates who do not need to scrub their accounts of offensive material?

This is about Romney sending a message.

Bully for him.

I’ve had it - I’m done.