To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
What a loser! I remember 1994 when they were ALL enthusiastic about getting big numbers in the house. The MSM was saying "Nah! They will get 2 to 4 seats, no way more than 6."
The GOP gained 54 seats. That was with Newt in charge, doing the planning and strategizing. Night before, MSM was IN TOTAL DENIAL and afterward, were ugly about the win--but I am redundant. They are always ugly, not just on special occasions.
vaudine
6 posted on
04/23/2012 4:19:22 PM PDT by
vaudine
To: vaudine
The WASHINGTONIANS are always the problem.
Never the solution.
The logical answer is to rotate the capital amongst the states.
7 posted on
04/23/2012 4:24:22 PM PDT by
Rome2000
(Rick Santorum -Mission Accomplished)
To: vaudine
That was with Newt in charge, doing the planning and strategizing. Night before, MSM was IN TOTAL DENIAL and afterward, were ugly about the win ... Wasn't that when one of the major Talking Heads (was it Brokaw?) who said that the voters had a "temper tantrum"?
Odd ... that's what Rally-'Round-Romney types accuse me of when I declare that I'll reject Romney at every turn, even (God forbid) if it comes to O vs R in the General. They think it's about "tantrums." No, it's about changing the leadership.
10 posted on
04/23/2012 4:30:05 PM PDT by
Finny
("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent * By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson