Posted on 04/21/2012 6:10:36 AM PDT by kevcol
A couple of things are certain:
DeeDee and Trayvon did not talk for 400 minutes on 2/26 the day he was shot.
DeeDee did not go to the hospital on 3/2 and 3/3 and that was NOT the reason for not attending the viewing or memorial.
DeeDee and Trayvon were not Boyfriend/Girlfriend. They were close, platonic best friends.
DeeDee was not devastated, destroyed, or an emotional wreck. She was sad that her best friend was shot. She notified others, including her cousin who is also a prolific tweeter, but did not know immediately who Trayvon was.
DeeDee did not miss school.
DeeDee did not contact anyone because there was no reason to.
Did DeeDee actually hear anything that night? Who knows. However, the mere fact that Benjamin Crump can be proven to have falsely constructed more than 80% of his press conference in order to plant false misleading misinformation in the media sure brings the entire narrative into question.
-snip-
The reason the prosecutor Angela Corey didnt go to the Grand Jury was because she would have either had to introduce DeeDees testimony, or avoid it completely. If she included the lies and the manipulations DeeDee would have been forced to bear witness at trial and OMara would be able to pull the lies out. That is why no Grand Jury was used. They wanted the media evidence of DeeDee to exist, but not the legal evidence,
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
There was no "casing" going on. Trayvon was walking home from the corner store with tea and Skittles-- and no one (except you) is arguing otherwise.
Martin took much longer going to store and back than it would have taken had he walked straight there and straight back. So he was doing...other things...
Read that a few days ago, several places.
I have no problem with anything you said.
So, it’s just your opinion that Zimmerman shouldn’t have gotten out of his truck?
Here’s my opinion.
Trayvon Martin shouldn’t have viciously attacked a law abiding citizen who was where he had every right to be at the time of the attack, otherwise he wouldn’t have been justifiably shot dead by said law abiding citizen.
Case closed.
Yeah, I know, he was a little black smurf skipping down the sidewalk wif his tea and skittles singing tra la la la la la la la.
Ain’t no one arguing that but you and a bunch of black racists.
Zimmerman can’t testify to what was in the thug’s system, but he can and did describe what he saw the thug doing.
Pardon me while I go with the eye witness account that casing was going on, and I reject the black racist narative of a child who was shot because he was walking while black, AND I’LL SERVE ON WHATEVER JURY I GET CALLED TO.
If you were to check back through my posts, you would find that I made basically the same comment. Martin should have disappeared around the corner and run home. His stupidity was to attack Zimmerman. He paid the ultimate price for stupidity.
Actually, he paid the ultimate price for violent criminality.
Which in fact makes me believe that if he was willing to behave as such, he was also willing to behave criminally otherwise i.e. burlgaries, especially in such a way that it drew the suspicion of a decent person.
So yeah, walks like a duck, talks like a duck blah, blah, blah...
It almost looks like Trayvon was dressed to referee that fight, but yeah he seems just fine around violence to me.
Thank you for the link, I had not seen that before, really appreciate it ^^
There was no “casing” going on. Trayvon was walking home from the corner store with tea and Skittles— and no one (except you) is arguing otherwise.
Oh, you were there? If you were not there walking with Martin, you don’t know what he was doing. Unless you are God.
LOL, that's what is called projection.
You were the one saying George shouldn't have gotten out of his car. He lived there. He had every right to get out of his car.
I could ask you the same question: Were you there? (And I know you're not God.)
As far as I know, the ME report has not yet been made public.
I’m not claiming that I know what Martin was doing, you are making that claim. I do know that he took much longer on the shopping trip than it would have taken if he had walked straight there and back.
What he was doing is unknown to me. And to you.
And to expound on my first post, “walking to the store to get some Skittles,” sounds like a perfect excuse to get away from Dad for a little while, maybe enough time to burn a doob.
How about the coroner’s report, then?
Having read all of the information out about that night, I know that you know that Dad wasn’t home.
If I see you wander around my street at night, aimlessly, in places where you clearly do not belong, I WILL approach you, I WILL talk to you. I will be polite, I will have a smile on my face, but I will also be armed, and if you don't wish to interact, then you better run as fast as you can in the opposite direction and never come back.
I cannot believe the neutered passivity some Freepers advocate in keeping order. Just cower behind the curtains and let the unionized "professionals" handle it. Makes me ill.
Where was he?
Clara. Go back and read *your* post #205 before you continue with your accusations.
"I have said that Z. should never have gotten out of his truck. But that doesnt mean I think hes guilty of any crime.
205 posted on April 22, 2012 11:56:50 AM EDT by Clara Lou [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.