I hardly think that scientific advance is “worthless”.
I don’t know what you mean by “scientific advance” but I will guess you mean “scientific advancement”.
And this article has nothing to do with the advancement of science.
Where in that article is there anything at all that has to do with science other than the fraudulent sounding guy with “Dr.” in front of his name?
I really am curious.
I hardly think this tripe is “scientific advance”. Methinks that Spitzer succombed to the gaystapo.
The soft sciences are no more science, than a refuse engineer is a true engineer.