Posted on 04/19/2012 12:37:11 PM PDT by C19fan
The Daily News can reveal the first photo of the 24-year-old Colombian call girl whose encounter with a cheapskate Secret Service agent ignited the agencys worst sex scandal. One of the agents tried to brush off his girl, the single mother of a 9-year-old son known as Tania, the next morning with only $28 in cab fare. She caused a ruckus, demanding her full payment, so cops got involved and word reached the US Embassy.
(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...
All I can say is...Hoochie mama!
Someone paid more than $47 for those.
Exactly!! Something like this isn’t worth losing and hurting your families. It’s do much easier to invest your time in your spouse and family then a one night of sex. And I don’t mean making love. When you ate having sex with someone you love that loves you back it’s so much more fulfilling. Sad stuff.
I bet Porgy would like her to help him “make the bed”.
I don’t know what Tingles or Andy would say, but nobody would hear them anyhow because every gas-bag Libsuck loser who could find a microphone would be crying crocodile tears and hollering their heads off.
HAVING SAID THAT...
I despise people who mistreat hookers. Yes, some of them like the work and do it because they want to, but for women in poor countries, there’s often not a lot of choice. This woman is supporting a kid (and probably a few other family members as well) and doesn’t deserve to be ripped off and trashed by the forces of “law and order” after providing the services they requested.
Who was this guy, anyhow? Right now, the entire US Secret Service is in the crapper because ONE GUY decided to be a total douche.
As the old adage goes “you don’t pay a prostitutes for sex, you pay them to leave.” With hookers you pay for animity, part of the “contract”.
Picking up a female who is just your usual slut for a one night stand introduces blackmail, pregnancy, and ‘Fatal Attractions’.
The Columbian Assacre was a result of bad contract negotiations.
“...who would be able to pass her by...”
She is certainly nice to look at. Although I could easily pass her by. Especially late in the evening after she’s already serviced a bunch of guys.
The term, “dirty-leg” comes to mind.
YEP!!!!!!
Then there must be a difference between a mature man and a "guy". Real men are in control of themselves and are not the unthinking slaves of their hormones.
Really, what is the difference? The higher amount this women received?
That's more of a condemnation of modern morality (or, as some might say, a lack thereof) than it is as a justification.
As a general rule, I try to avoid using one bad behavior to justify another one. It gets one called out on it almost as fast as making a hypocritical pronouncement.
The only difference is that with hypocritical condemnation, it doesn't negate the truth of the statement; only the person making the case.
As I recall, Jesus didn't condemn what the Pharisees were saying so much as the fact that they were even more guilty of what they were preaching against.
That's where the whole story doesn't make sense..
Payment terms are more fluid abroad. Flashing the negotiated sum is usually considered a good faith basis to get started. Cash up front in America by Johns is to seed the ground for an “entrapment” defense to the use of female officer decoys.
It sounds to me more like an episode of a collective lapse in judgment, perhaps occasioned by poor management or serial disrespect as a consequence of such management.
That's not to say that third-party foreign influence was not in some way involved. But what you describe (metaphorically) is best achieved by compromising a single individual in pursuit of a narrow strategic objective. Vladimir Vladimirovich would know all about it.
I’d hit it...
There’s a lot of debate on whether this girl is just about perfect and totally “not guilty”, or nothing special. She’s definitely not below average, even with a face that isn’t anywhere near as attractive as her body. However, she looks to me like an average 24 y/o girl with fake breasts added, not as pretty as Spitzer’s downfall. She’d get my attention, very easily, but I’ve never met a prostitute/hooker/escort who I felt was worth paying for - even before the cost of $28-$800 plus my self-respect might have escalated to include my job, marriage, family, reputation, and my country’s image.
I’m not convinced the guy tried to stiff the girl on payment, nor am I convinced that she tried to raise her rates after the fact once she saw his gun. The only thing I’m sure of is that these guys are now realizing what they should have figured out before they brought girls to their rooms while discussing money - they were being too stupid for words.
Pictures of the hooker are interesting — even, perhaps, titillating. But I want pictures of the john.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.