To: kevcol
Crump just threw the case. It sounds to me like he’s conceding Martin started the fight. His logic that event A (in a chain of events) resulted in event F is deeply flawed, and will be seen as nonsense.
To: trappedincanuckistan
Crump just threw the case. It sounds to me like he’s conceding Martin started the fight. His logic that event A (in a chain of events) resulted in event F is deeply flawed, and will be seen as nonsense. Which might be of significance if he was taking the case to trial, but he isn't.
8 posted on
04/19/2012 12:08:10 PM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
(This world is a comedy to those that think, a tragedy to those that feel - Horace Walpole)
To: trappedincanuckistan
"Trayvon Martin had every right to stand his ground, Crump said. We believe that Trayvon went to his grave not knowing who this strange man was that was approaching and confronting him." By "stand his ground" Crump means "Trayvon had a right to start beating Zimmerman when Zimmerman asked him "What are you doing here?"" They're going to need a jury of real 0bamaZombies to buy that.
31 posted on
04/19/2012 2:05:09 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson