[Sola Veritas]

“Thanks for your very entertaining post, and strive for civility!”

Several months ago I was wrongly uncivil to you, and chose never to do so again.

I’m going to ignore your sarcasm, because you fail to miss my point. You or we do not need Ann Coulter. What little good information she may provide is tainted with her desire to be one of Romney’s wives (that is sarcasm). She doesn’t really understand conservatism in the same way I do, or even the way you do. IF she did, she would not support Romney. She has been coopted by the GOPe.

[Syncro]

I'm sure you were uncivil to me in the past, but my message to you was your extremely uncivil attitude towards Coulter.

Need or not need is not the point.

Coulter provides great insight into important matters, in spite of her support of Romney.

Many civil conservatives appreciate that. Here at FR and elsewhere.

Those that get emotionally upset at her existence in the world of political pundation should just not click on threads with her expoundations.

Take that chill pill you offered me...

: > )