Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eddie willers

Big difference. Bush was pro-life, pro-family and somewhat conservative in other areas. Even served his country. Same goes for McLame, pro-life, pro-family, somewhat conservative on some issues and served his country. A war hero. Romney is none of the above. But McLame was a RINO loser who could not enthuse the base to turnout, and so it will go down with Liar/Loser McRomney.


64 posted on 04/17/2012 5:26:23 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (There's no crying in rebellion!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson
Big difference. Bush was pro-life, pro-family and somewhat conservative in other areas. Even served his country. Same goes for McLame, pro-life, pro-family, somewhat conservative on some issues and served his country. A war hero. Romney is none of the above. But McLame was a RINO loser who could not enthuse the base to turnout, and so it will go down with Liar/Loser McRomney.

How the HELL did we end up here?

I know, of course:

  1. A co-opted 'Republican' party who is much more interested in ruling than it is in preserving America, her traditions, or the rights of her citizens.
  2. A colluding media who is only too happy to assist in the orchestration of the most left-wing candidate offered by the so-called right, ever.

Those are the two offending parties, and if you ever had the chance to vote for me, those are the EXACT two parties I would put my efforts into reforming.

70 posted on 04/17/2012 5:31:11 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson