[SoConPubbie]

I guess we're all in denial because we disagree with you. Hey, did Obama withdraw Kagan or Sotomayor based on our objections? No. However the liberal Republican Bush withdrew Harriet Myers after we Conservatives lobbied hard. He replaced her with a GREAT Judge that has upheld our Conservative values. You can ignore that reality. I won't.

Harriet Myers was at worst a flawed conservative, Romney on the other hand, nominated 27 extreme, left-wing, Progressive Liberals out of 36 nominations.

There is no comparison between GWB and whatever his flaws are and Mitt Romney and his sordid, lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal record, especially on judicial nominations.

Legal analysts say candidate Romney is different from Gov. Romney.

Liberty Counsel Action Vice President Matt Barber said Romney’s appointments were constitutional “living document” poster children.

“Many of Romney’s appointments were not only liberal, not only Democrats, but were radical counter-constitutionalists. How on earth can we expect that, as president, he would be any different?” Barber asked rhetorically.

“Actions speak louder than words, and Mitt Romney’s actions as governor scream from the rooftops that he cannot be trusted with this most important of presidential responsibilities.”

Barber cites two specific examples of Romney’s radical appointments.

“As governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney not only failed in this regard, he appointed a number of very liberal, if not radical, ‘living, breathing’-minded judges to the bench,” Barber said.

“Two that come to mind were extreme homosexualists Marianne C. Hinkle and Stephen Abany,” he said. “They both had a long history of pro-gay activism, yet Romney didn’t hesitate to put them on the bench.” “These are people who outrageously believe the postmodern notion that newfangled ‘gay rights’ trump our constitutionally guaranteed First Amendment rights,” he said.

Baldwin agreed, citing Romney’s statements about the two requirements he actually used when selecting judges.

“Romney did focus on two criteria: their legal experience and whether they would be tough on crime. In other words, the nominee could be a gay activist or a pro-big government, pro-quota, pro-gun control Democrat Party hack who detests every judicial principle treasured by our founding fathers,” Baldwin said. “But if he happens to be tough on crime and have prosecutorial experience, he gets past the Romney filter. Many of Romney’s nominees fit that description.”

Baldwin added that Romney did have some ideological criteria for many of his nominees:

“It was criteria commonly used by the left. For starters, his nominees were mostly pro-abortion. Indeed, while campaigning for governor in 2002, Romney told the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) that his judicial nominees would more likely protect abortion rights than would those of a Democrat Governor, according to notes from a person attending this meeting.”

Another Romney criteria, Baldwin explained, was “diversity.”

“The other criteria consistently emphasized by Gov. Romney in deciding judicial selections was ‘diversity.’ This is the silly notion that judgeships should reflect the population in terms of race and gender and even sexual orientation, regardless of a person’s judicial philosophy,” he said. “Clearly, the use of diversity quotas demonstrates Romney’s lack of a coherent conservative worldview.”

[Nicojones]

“Harriet Myers was at worst a flawed conservative, Romney on the other hand, nominated 27 extreme, left-wing, Progressive Liberals out of 36 nominations”

That's a stretch. Although she was a born again Christian, she was a former Democrat that had her nomination tanked by an outcry of Conservatives like myself. I won't bore you with a review of her record. You can google it yourself. Heck, search free republic for all of the threads at that time, most calling her words to the effect of a liberal Trojan horse. In my opinion, using her name next to Conservative, even with the prefix “flawed”, is an insult to all Conservatives.