Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmel

The first chance we get to “fight” RINO Romney is at the ballot box.

What if the GOP officially said they’re changing their platform into a pro-choice platform? Would everyone here still vote GOP (not counting you libertards)? The logic you Romney supplicants are using would apply EVEN IF the GOP officially made their platform pro-choice. There are some issues where you have to be willing to hold other things hostage in order to get what you want. It’s not a strategy to say, “OK, fine, we’ll vote for you even if you give up that issue. We’ll just whine and moan and try to change your mind later, I guess, even as we fall into line behind you at the time when our opposition would REALLY carry some weight!”

Well, I’m not going to let them use the stealth method of picking a candidate who every informed voter knows, or soon will know, has stood on the wrong side of that issue among many others. They have said frequently they are trying to win “moderate” or “independent” voters over with this candidate. The point is to put up a candidate who does NOT represent conservative values to try to win those additional voters. To me that’s little different than officially changing the platform. They are sending the message that this candidate does not and will not stand for conservative values intentionally and for a purpose. Their strategy only works if conservative voters fall into line anyway like good little supplicants. My intention is for their strategy to fail.


59 posted on 04/17/2012 5:20:53 PM PDT by JediJones (From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones

If you could have beeb aware of my posting history, you would have known that untila few days ago I was one of Romney’s staunchest opponents, for all the excellent reasons that you mention. I swore nothing could make me vote for him. Hussein’s blatant agenda to weak havoc on whites, made clear as crystal ( if it never was before-it was to me) changed my mind. I still don’t believe it myself. But though Romney is everything else that Obama is, one thing he’s not is anti-white. That’s one less battle, and to me it’s a big one. It will involve bloodshed before the black racist groups get what they think they want. We already have a congress wetting its pants for fear of being called “rayciss” if they oppose rat legislation approved by Hussein. At least with Romney they can’t hide behind that fear.

I think you jumped the gun a bit in calling me a Romney “supplicant” and various other epithets. My history tells otherwise.


61 posted on 04/17/2012 6:02:43 PM PDT by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson