To: upchuck
Why not hold the summit in a small town where it is easier to secure an area. Like maybe Plattville or Helmar?
3 posted on
04/17/2012 6:58:05 AM PDT by
rfreedom4u
(Just because someone thinks it's a good idea doesn't make it legal.)
To: rfreedom4u
Why not hold the summit in a small town where it is easier to secure an area.
And lose the opportunity to train for urban assault in built-up terrain?
31 posted on
04/17/2012 2:19:11 PM PDT by
andyk
(Go Juan Pablo!)
To: rfreedom4u
Why not hold the summit in a small town where it is easier to secure an area. Like maybe Plattville or Helmar?
Entertainment and accessibility. I saw more than a few summits, conferences, whatever you want to call them, with high-ranking government officials during my time in the military, from the '70s through the '90s, Asia, the Middle East, Europe, the US and Canada.
They aren't going to travel all that way just to visit Podunkville. Everything they discuss in person could most likely be conducted via email and teleconferences (and probably already has been discussed on some level). This is all about taking advantage of their positions.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson