To: smokingfrog
The robber pointed his gun at the retired trooper, who pulled out his own weapon and began shooting.Whoa. It can take one to three seconds to draw and fire your weapon. And to do that when your opponent already has their weapon pointed at you is either suicidal or really gutsy.
3 posted on
04/17/2012 6:00:32 AM PDT by
John123
(US$ - I owe you nothing. Euro - Who owes you nothing.)
To: John123
5 posted on
04/17/2012 6:12:57 AM PDT by
Carriage Hill
(I'd vote for a "orange juice can", before 0bummer&HisRegimeFromHell, gets another 4yrs. Can-> later.)
To: John123
Maybe the bad guy, a drug addict possibly, thought that he had all the power in the situation. I’m guessing he was too messed up to think clearly or react to things well enough to survive. Obviously the retired cop made that guess too and acted on it.
I would not advise playing cards with this guy for money.
6 posted on
04/17/2012 6:18:59 AM PDT by
Mrs. P
(Figures can lie, and liars can figure.)
To: John123
Whoa. It can take one to three seconds to draw and fire your weapon. And to do that when your opponent already has their weapon pointed at you is either suicidal or really gutsy. Depends on how far away the bad guy is.
Keep in mind that most bad guys don't spend much time at the range. If the bad guy is more than 10 feet away, it's unlikely he'll actually be able to hit his target, while somebody who practices can hit HIM from across the store.
Also keep in mind the element of surprise. The bad guy was probably frozen in shock that somebody drew on him.
7 posted on
04/17/2012 6:20:54 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
To: John123
Whoa. It can take one to three seconds to draw and fire your weapon. And to do that when your opponent already has their weapon pointed at you is either suicidal or really gutsy. Actually there are plenty of people who can draw and fire under a second. It was proved by demonstration back in the 1960s that some people could draw and fire, while facing an armed perp with hammer cocked and gun pointed, before the perp could fire his/her weapon. Saw it done more than once back in the day.
8 posted on
04/17/2012 6:31:01 AM PDT by
calex59
To: John123
Just because that is the way it was described doesn't mean the retired trooper didn't move to cover first, then draw his weapon, then engage the suspect.
You are correct. Attempting to pull a gun on somebody holding a gun on you is usually suicidal.
11 posted on
04/17/2012 6:44:38 AM PDT by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: John123
Watch their eyes, they’ll tell you what they’ll do next.
13 posted on
04/17/2012 7:39:44 AM PDT by
X-spurt
(Its time for ON YOUR FEET or on your knees)
To: John123
Watch their eyes, they’ll tell you what they’ll do next.
14 posted on
04/17/2012 7:40:05 AM PDT by
X-spurt
(Its time for ON YOUR FEET or on your knees)
To: John123
if it takes someone three seconds to draw and get off a round a little range time would be recommended
18 posted on
04/17/2012 8:46:29 AM PDT by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: John123
The robber pointed his gun at the retired trooper, who pulled out his own weapon and began shooting.Don't believe everything you read.
19 posted on
04/17/2012 9:04:17 AM PDT by
oneolcop
(Lead, Follow or Get the Hell Out of the Way!)
To: John123
I never accept the story line. What really happened is probably not what the reporter wrote. Most likely, the retired police officer fired at a time that was safer for him, such as when the robber turned or shifted his eyes somewhere else.
28 posted on
04/17/2012 10:30:03 AM PDT by
lormand
(A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson