Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

I haven’t read much on the F-35. Why would the conventional version cost more and be delayed more than the VTL version?

I would think the vertical take-off would be much more complex.


3 posted on 04/17/2012 5:51:56 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty and Justice for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FreeAtlanta

The JSF program is a disaster. Time to restart the F-22 line, and think about a purpose-built carrier-based fighter.


4 posted on 04/17/2012 5:58:11 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: FreeAtlanta

Its not just the fighter, its the refit of current British military systems to incorporate a successor to the Harrier that is not the same type of fighter.

That means refit of ships, supplies, training and doctrine, ect.


5 posted on 04/17/2012 5:59:54 AM PDT by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: FreeAtlanta

There are two separate issues concerning the Brits here. One is that the undercarriage of the F-35C needs to be modified after its tailhook failed to snag arrester wires in tests.

And then there is the whole issue of having to modify the initial design of the two British carriers (being built) which was optimsed for the F-35B.


6 posted on 04/17/2012 6:02:33 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson