'Tea party' pols sell out the tea party - Names who endorsed Romney after taking cash from his PACs

World Net Daily ^ | 02/06/2012 at 8:17 PM | Steve Baldwin

[SoConPubbie]

And the Un-Masking of Mitt Romney, the left-wing, Progressive Liberal, continues . . .
"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton

[EGPWS]

“He’s been consistent since he changed his mind.”

ROTFLMAO!!!!

[cripplecreek]

This is exactly why I’m so tired of hearing the fantasy that we’ll hold Mitt’s feet to the fire.

I see know reason to believe we will because we can’t even keep tea party congressmen from being co opted. Saying we’ll hold Mitt’s feet to the fire has about as much validity is when democrats claim they’re helping the poor.

[moovova]

Grrrrrrrr...

[cripplecreek]

And he’ll be consistent till he changes his mind again.

[tallyhoe]

Is Governor Moombeam treading on you? How is he working out for California? Could move ya know to another state!

[Clock King]

Any successful organization, whether a civic group, or a church, or business or political group, will eventually attract PARASITES because it is successful. Nobody likes the idea of being judged or the idea of ideological purity tests, but at some point, you have to refocus and drive the parasites out your system.

[nikos1121]

Let me ask you something. Predict as best you can, who Romney would pick for SCOTUS. I think that says it all.

[cripplecreek]

Well he sure picked plenty of liberals for the courts as governor.

[risen_feenix]

“If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures.” - Alexander Hamilton

Thanks. I’m stealing that quote and using it everywhere until election day.

[presently no screen name]

Reading the comments about mitt, I kept thinking of that post on the other thread where it lists all his failures in employment, etc. during his admin and things actually got worse in MA. He really is evil filled!

Wonder if the TeaParty approached them and asked for their money back due to them being frauds as they will so easily can be bought off and state untruths about mitt’s accomplishments to put him in a much better light that deceives voters.

[broken_arrow1]

Romney didn’t win the primaries fair-and-square as the political pundits would have you believe. In many states, the GOP launched a lot of RNC contribution money (10:1) against conservative candidates disguised as Super PACs. This was never a fair fight! A lot of individual contributors to the RNC should be very upset with how their money was spent.

[SoConPubbie]

Is Governor Moombeam treading on you? How is he working out for California? Could move ya know to another state!

Same thing Romney did to MA.

Peas in a pod.

And yes, as soon as I can, God willing, I'm vacating the once great state of California.

I'm afraid that nothing but a complete collapse or a real Holy Spirit led spiritual revival can save my state.

It's dead.

[presently no screen name]

I feel the same and laugh when I see that statement - hold his feet to the fire. That empty suit doesn’t have an honest bone in his body. He’s evil filled and evil does what evil does - evil! Evil doesn’t do good only to deceive as the end effect is evil.

[APatientMan]

“...pursuing their own agenda at the expense of the conservative movement and the tea party.”

They didn’t cost Conservatives or the TEA Party anything. Not a d@mn thing. We’re grateful to know who they are. They didn’t create us.
If they want short-term benefit over long-term gain, so be it. We’re in it for the long-haul (or until “When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary...”)

[i are a cowboy]

The problem with applying that quote to today's situation is that Hamilton's enemies still had the true best interest of the country at heart. They did not have an enemy who's obvious intention was to fundamentally dismantle what so many had worked and sacrificed to build. I would vote for a ham sandwich to replace our true enemy.

[SoConPubbie]

Let me ask you something. Predict as best you can, who Romney would pick for SCOTUS. I think that says it all.

You're right, Romney's deplorable record on judicial appointments does say it all:

Romney nominated 27 extreme left-wing, Progressive Liberals out of 36 nominations.

Legal analysts say candidate Romney is different from Gov. Romney.

Liberty Counsel Action Vice President Matt Barber said Romney’s appointments were constitutional “living document” poster children.

“Many of Romney’s appointments were not only liberal, not only Democrats, but were radical counter-constitutionalists. How on earth can we expect that, as president, he would be any different?” Barber asked rhetorically.

“Actions speak louder than words, and Mitt Romney’s actions as governor scream from the rooftops that he cannot be trusted with this most important of presidential responsibilities.”

Barber cites two specific examples of Romney’s radical appointments.

“As governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney not only failed in this regard, he appointed a number of very liberal, if not radical, ‘living, breathing’-minded judges to the bench,” Barber said.

“Two that come to mind were extreme homosexualists Marianne C. Hinkle and Stephen Abany,” he said. “They both had a long history of pro-gay activism, yet Romney didn’t hesitate to put them on the bench.”

“These are people who outrageously believe the postmodern notion that newfangled ‘gay rights’ trump our constitutionally guaranteed First Amendment rights,” he said.

Baldwin agreed, citing Romney’s statements about the two requirements he actually used when selecting judges.

“Romney did focus on two criteria: their legal experience and whether they would be tough on crime. In other words, the nominee could be a gay activist or a pro-big government, pro-quota, pro-gun control Democrat Party hack who detests every judicial principle treasured by our founding fathers,” Baldwin said. “But if he happens to be tough on crime and have prosecutorial experience, he gets past the Romney filter. Many of Romney’s nominees fit that description.”

How is it that so many of you pimping Romney are so ignorant of his record?

[SoConPubbie]

The problem with applying that quote to today's situation is that Hamilton's enemies still had the true best interest of the country at heart. They did not have an enemy who's obvious intention was to fundamentally dismantle what so many had worked and sacrificed to build. I would vote for a ham sandwich to replace our true enemy.

Prove your contention.

Bad assumption on your part.

[presently no screen name]

real Holy Spirit led spiritual revival can save my state.

Aren't we to have one last one? However, I don't think it going to change much in the country, evil will still be rampant but many lives will be changed. I could be wrong.

I think people, in general, are more 'dead' now - such gloom and a lack of caring. I mean people who are generally good folk - a change in them. Like everyone took one or two steps down. Like the bad got very bad. So it may not be just CA.

Actually, it follows the article. There was a time, one's word was their honor. Now they take and then will sell their soul to evil for some cash to deliberately deceive voters. Not that it effects some small town in anywhere USA. But USA itself.

Like how Barry got in, how many were paid off with favors or whatever or possibly some threatened not to address this or that. It's amazing how many only care about themselves and not our country that they were hired/elected to do. I just thought of something this......

2 Timothy 3

1 But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days.

2 People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy,

3 without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good,

4 treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God—

5 having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with such people.

[jennings2004]

However, Mr. Hamilton, in his wildest imagination, could never have anticipated the advent of this “Dear Leader!”