Replies

This is the spirit of the Tea Party. Just because they decided not to be socially active in conservative social issues does not mean they want to be socially dictated to by liberatarians (humanists) instead of Christians or Muslims. They want to be free to be ethical and raise there own children and associate with the ethics (sexual and otherwise) they choose for their own families and walk in life.

Yep.

Where I disagree with you is that if you want to be granted the ability to live your life the way you desire... and want to raise your children the want you believe; then you have to grant that to others that do not live their lives the way you do, nor raise their children the way you would.

And what I see with the majority of the vocal social conservatives here at the Free Republic... is that they most adamantly *DO NOT* believe in that point.

The postings I've seen from them simply boil down to how their social beliefs are right (fine and dandy to me, because I agree with them)... and how everyone else that doesn't have those same values most be made, through the force of law, to comply with them.

Which I don't agree with, as explained in my first paragraph.

Which dovetails nicely into the small-government, states' rights point of view.

And what I see with the majority of the vocal social conservatives here at the Free Republic... is that they most adamantly *DO NOT* believe in that point.

That’s bull. Liberals have been busily cultural cleansing Christians for a long time now in the name of racial and sexual freedom and special rights.

You are brainwashed if you think liberals going into public schools and preaching homosexuality at children is not targeted at cultural cleansing the Christians. It’s Soviet. I don’t want to cuss so I will shut up now.