[[Romney’s already a loser...and the GOP-e — not us — picked the loser...]]
That’s the spirit-
[[If the GOP-e wanted to — for a change of pace — consider its base & who we would support, it wouldn’t have given us Romney. ]]
True- but they didn’t- an it is what it is- and we have to try to make hte best of a crappy siturtion- or at least we should isntead of declarign everything is hopeless
[[...but seared your conscience forever...
...you’ve permanently lost ANY ground upon which to criticize ANY big-government/socialized boondoggle...having supported a big-govt socialist boondoggle candidate yourself...]]
Let’s make oen htign clear here- I don’t support romeny- I support voting obama who is MUCH MUCH worse than romeny out of office for all the reasons I’ve previously stated-
Let’s say that you know of a boss who is abusing employees- is brutal, cruel, hates his employees, and does whatever he can to make life miserable for them- and let’s say that life has becoem unbearable under that boss- now let’s say a person is running to replace that boss- and is the only choice we’ve got to replace that boss but hwo isn’t everythign we had hooped for- woudl it be better to keep the abusive cruekl boss inplace? Or go with htel esser of two evils for the sake of easing some of he cruelty agaisnt the abused employees?
We KNOW for a FACt that udner obama- millions have lost hteir jos, businesses have had such strict regulations put on them that htey’ve had to fire people, folsk havel ost hteir homes and are out on the streets, and that that whole families are lving o nthe streets duwe to losding hteir homes thanks to a far left socialist liberal who couldn’t give two craps abotu them- Is it ethical to abstain from voting and keeping a known antiamerican out of touch chicago thug in office? Or shoudl we try to at the very leaqst lessen the abuse by voting in a different boss even if they aren’t optimal if it’;s the oly real chance we have to get the current thiug out of office?
you talk abotu conscience beign seared- Yet apparently you’rs wouldn’;t be seared IF obama were to get another 4 years, and it was shown statistically that had mroe conservatives simpyly held hteir noses and voted romeny then he wouldn’t have gaiend another 4 years?
I;m sorry, but I don’;t understand how leavign someone so brutally and blatantly antiamerican in office is better than gettign someone in who at least does have soem conservative values- obama has none- zero- zip- nada- Hell, he isn’;t even proud of this country!
I just dont get it-
Who says everything is hopeless? (I don't)
Sure, it appears "hopeless" for the conservative humanists among us who like to trust in political solutions & political "saviors." That's not where I place my trust.
One man -- even Romney or Obama -- doesn't make or break a country alone. God is sovereign; and the corruption extends well beyond Romney & Obama as reasons God could economically judge this country.
I would say that the reality that we have so many conservatives -- and so many Christians -- willing to vote for a guy who claims he is a "god in embryo" and will one day rival THE God for worship, reception of prayer, adoration, creative right of souls, etc...would simply be another reason for God to IMMEDIATELY judge this nation beyond mere economics. (For some reason, God hasn't appreciated idolatry -- especially coming from people claiming to be His people).
Let’s say that you know of a boss who is abusing employees- is brutal, cruel, hates his employees, and does whatever he can to make life miserable for them- and let’s say that life has becoem unbearable under that boss- now let’s say a person is running to replace that boss- and is the only choice we’ve got to replace that boss but hwo isn’t everythign we had hooped for- woudl it be better to keep the abusive cruekl boss inplace? Or go with htel esser of two evils for the sake of easing some of he cruelty agaisnt the abused employees?
Let's say THE Anti-Christ was a Dem & he was in office. Let's say an (R) guy came along -- said he was Hitler reincarnated -- and a vote for him would get THE anti-Christ out of office...Would you vote for the "lesser of two evils?" Would you promote evil and endorse evil? Do you vote for one socialist to rid yourself of another? Are you not "evil" and a socialist supporter either way?
You see, your formula -- and that of many FREEPERs & other conservatives -- trains the next two generations to vote for a guy to the left of Obama down the line...just because the there will always be a worse (d) candidate!
I;m sorry, but I don’;t understand how leavign someone so brutally and blatantly antiamerican in office is better than gettign someone in who at least does have soem conservative values- obama has none- zero- zip- nada- Hell, he isn’;t even proud of this country!
It's called having a choice in this country. If we want -- for the rest of our nation's history -- to be choosing between two socialists...choosing between two pro-aborts...choosing between two liberals...then go ahead with your scheme.
Instead, if you want to be part of the rebellion and tell the RINO GoP-e that "No, there aren't enough pro-abort, big govt. socialist-liberal voters in this country to support two mainstream pro-abort, big-govt. socialist-liberal candidates," then vote third party.
Otherwise, once the pro-abort, Big Govt Socialist-liberal "Waterloo" is crossed, there's no turning back. THIS IS the "make or break" time...At some point, "tough love" needs to show some boundaries instead of just letting the GoP-e take you for granted and walk all over you...belieiving you'll always cave because of your cowardice motivated by fear.
Stand up and take it like a pre-born baby. Instead of being the milquetoast men we see around us, stand up and at least be like a pre-born baby! Half of them die -- most due to the liberal agenda of abortion & abortion drugs; you don't hear them whining about "survival," do you???