If the ‘conservatives’, regardless of position/fame/influence choose to abandon everything they have told us repeatedly that they believe in to back a Pro abortion/pro gay/pro GW et all candidate, then it is they who will have taken themselves out of the conservative camp.
If you abandon the actual republican platform as written, then you are by definition, a RINO.
Now please explain any logical flaw in that statement.
So basically Palin who said “anyone but Obama” and Bachmann, and Santorum, and Newt and the Tea Party, and Ryan, and Christie, and Rush, and Mark, and Savage etc. etc. etc. and me, we’re all RINO’s because we think Obama is dangerous to the Country the way we know it and love it, we’re RINO’s because we see if Obama wins? the Country the way it’s headed will have more people dependent on it then those who contribute to it, we’re all wrong?
If you abandon the actual republican platform as written, then you are by definition, a RINO.
Now please explain any logical flaw in that statement.
The logical flaw is stating as a certainty that the Republican nominee will actually abandon the party platform. The only time I remember a candidate actually saying the platform didn't matter was Bob Dole in 96. Did you vote for him... or Perot?