True, but those are at most nothing but symbolic gestures that amount to a fart in a windstorm, but the real damage will still be the same in the end.....and, like it or not, the vast majority of the population WILL consider Mitt to be a representative of Conservatism, even though we all here know that's bulsh. But Romney will destroy conservatism for good. At least with Obama, the Rats will own it, and we can regroup for 2016.
>> the real damage will still be the same in the end <<
I can’t agree:
1. If the Congress passes a bill to repeal Øbamacare, then Baraq would veto the bill. Romney would not.
2. Baraq wants to reduce our Navy to its lowest level since World War ONE. Romney wants to strengthen the Navy.
3. Baraq wants to reduce our nuclear arsenal to 200 warheads or less. Romney will keep it at around 600 to 800.
4. Baraq has already told Putin that he’ll give in to Russian demands if re-elected. Romney won’t, because he would want to be re-elected in 2016.
5. Baraq has already dissed Netanyahu umpteen times and gives every sign of abandonning Israel in the face of Iranian threats. Romney and Netanyahu are close friends, dating from their work years ago at the same firm in Boston, and Romney gives every sign of strong support for Israel.
6. Baraq is advised on SCOTUS appointments by Eric Holder. Romney is advised by Robert Bork.
7. Baraq is advised on foreign relations by Hilary Clinton. Romney is advised by John Bolton.
Sure, Romney is far from the best candidate the ‘Pubs could choose. He suffers from numerous flaws, and he’s absolutely terrible in some respects. I’d much prefer Paul Ryan, Mitch Daniels, Haley Barbour, Rick Perry or Rick Santorum.
But we gotta face it:
The next POTUS will be either Øbama or Romney. And there’s simply no way that Romney can be as bad as another four years of Baraq. Let’s be real. As another Freeper said recently, You don’t get to choose your own reality. It creates itself.